Tasks and Duties
Task Objective: In this task, you will explore the theoretical foundations and core principles of Virtual Human-Centered Design by studying the Design Thinking course principles. Your goal is to prepare a detailed document that serves as a foundation for understanding the interplay between human needs and design strategies. This task focuses on research, reflection, and analysis.
Expected Deliverables: Submit a DOC file that includes an introduction to the selected design principles, an analysis of key theoretical models, and a reflective summary on how these principles can be applied in virtual environments.
Key Steps:
- Research and review at least three core Design Thinking models using publicly available literature. Summarize each model and highlight their relevance to virtual human-centered design.
- Develop an outline that explains how these models integrate with virtual design environments and how they influence user interactions in a digital world.
- Create a reflective section where you provide your personal insights regarding the adoption of these strategies in remote and virtual settings.
- Ensure your document is well-organized, includes proper headings and subheadings, and uses a coherent narrative style.
Evaluation Criteria:
- The document must be structured logically and demonstrate a deep understanding of design thinking concepts.
- The research should be well-documented with clear references to publicly available resources.
- The reflection section should be critical, providing new perspectives and thoughtful insights.
- Clear, error-free language and a professional tone in the submission are expected.
This task is designed to be a comprehensive introduction to virtual human-centered design. It should take approximately 30 to 35 hours of work, and the final DOC file must be submitted as your deliverable. Your analysis and reflection should not only cover theoretical components but also illustrate practical insights into how these theories can be effectively implemented in a virtual context.
Task Objective: This task requires you to dive deep into user research techniques, focusing on empathy mapping as a key element in human-centered design. You will create an empathy map based on a theoretical user scenario while linking your approach to the concepts covered in the Design Thinking course.
Expected Deliverables: Deliver a DOC file that outlines a detailed empathy map along with a user research plan. The document should contain background research, user persona development, and a justification for the research methods used.
Key Steps:
- Start with a brief literature review on empathy mapping and its role in human-centered design with links to virtual experiences.
- Create a detailed empathy map for a hypothetical digital user, including sections such as thoughts, feelings, pains, and gains.
- Develop a user research plan that describes the methods (e.g., interviews, surveys, observations) you would use to validate this empathy map.
- Explain how the insights from your empathy mapping can be translated into actionable design improvements in a virtual environment.
Evaluation Criteria:
- The empathy map should be comprehensive, capturing various dimensions of user experience.
- The research plan must be realistic, detailed, and backed by public research articles and findings.
- Your analysis should clearly explain the connection between empathy mapping and practical design strategies.
- The submitted DOC file should be well-organized, free of grammatical errors, and demonstrate critical thinking.
This task offers a hands-on approach to understanding user emotions and needs in a virtual setting. Expect to invest 30 to 35 hours refining both your theoretical exposition and practical application. Your document will serve as a robust reference case for further design iterations during your internship.
Task Objective: In this task, you will engage in the ideation phase of the Design Thinking process. The objective is to generate and document innovative design concepts that address identified user needs in virtual environments. This exercise simulates real-world brainstorming and concept development sessions in human-centered design.
Expected Deliverables: Submit a DOC file that contains an ideation workshop summary, a list of innovative design ideas, a conceptual model for one selected idea, and a justification of how it addresses users' pain points and motivations.
Key Steps:
- Review ideation techniques discussed in the Design Thinking course, such as brainstorming, mind mapping, and SCAMPER.
- Conduct a self-driven ideation session where you generate a variety of ideas aimed at solving specific user issues in virtual design.
- Select the most viable idea and create a detailed conceptual model. Include sketches, diagrams, or flowcharts that capture the user journey and interaction points.
- Explain how the concept aligns with user needs and the principles of virtual human-centered design.
Evaluation Criteria:
- The ideation process must be well-documented, showing a clear progression from idea generation to concept validation.
- The conceptual model should be innovative, user-focused, and thoroughly justified with reference to design thinking principles.
- The explanation must be clear, comprehensive, and grounded in research and best practices from publicly available sources.
- The overall DOC file should be structured in a logical, professional manner with no language or format errors.
This assignment encourages creative thinking and technical precision while functioning independently. Allocate 30 to 35 hours to explore multiple ideas and refine one promising concept. Your detailed documentation should reflect both the creative process and a practical application of virtual design strategies.
Task Objective: This task emphasizes the practical application of design concepts through prototyping and storyboarding. Your objective is to create a low-fidelity prototype visualized through a storyboard depicting a virtual user experience that aligns with earlier ideation outputs.
Expected Deliverables: Submit a DOC file that provides a comprehensive storyboard and a detailed explanation of your prototyping approach. The document should include visual elements (such as sketches or flow diagrams) embedded within the text, a narrative description of the user journey, and an evaluation of potential design iterations.
Key Steps:
- Start by reviewing key principles of prototyping in a virtual context drawing from the Design Thinking course.
- Create a storyboard that captures the sequence of interactions in your designed virtual experience. Use clear visual representations integrated within the DOC file.
- Write a detailed narrative that explains each frame of the storyboard, emphasizing the user journey, decision points, and potential improvements.
- Include sections that discuss the challenges encountered during the prototyping phase and suggest future design iterations.
Evaluation Criteria:
- The prototype should be defined clearly through the storyboard and depict a coherent sequence of user interactions.
- Visual elements should be clear, well-labeled, and integrated into the document in a reader-friendly manner.
- The narrative must thoroughly explain design decisions and how the storyboard translates design concepts into practical experience.
- The DOC file should be organized logically, with a professional tone and error-free content.
This task will simulate the process of creating a realistic prototype. Dedicate roughly 30 to 35 hours to ensure that your storyboard and narrative are both visually compelling and intellectually rigorous. The final submission will demonstrate your ability to bridge creative concepts with executable design plans in a virtual setting.
Task Objective: This week, you will simulate a user testing phase for your virtual design prototype. The goal is to develop a testing plan, simulate user feedback, and propose actionable design improvements. The exercise is designed to mirror real-world iterative design based on user insights.
Expected Deliverables: Submit a DOC file that includes a comprehensive user testing plan, a simulated set of user feedback responses, and a detailed analysis of how this feedback can refine your design. Your document must include an introduction, methodology, results analysis, and a conclusion with refined design recommendations.
Key Steps:
- Review the concept of user testing in the context of Design Thinking. Develop a plan outlining the testing objectives, participant profiles, and testing methods that you believe are most applicable in a virtual design scenario.
- Generate a simulated set of user responses (based on theoretical scenarios) and summarize the findings.
- Analyze the feedback in detail, identifying key trends, successes, and potential areas for improvement in your design.
- Propose a plan for integrating the feedback into design iterations, providing a clear rationale for each suggested change.
Evaluation Criteria:
- Your user testing plan should be detailed, realistic, and directly related to the principles learned in the Design Thinking course.
- The analysis must be methodical, clearly relating simulated feedback to specific design elements.
- The recommendations should be practical, innovative, and tied back to human-centered design strategies for virtual environments.
- The DOC file should be well-structured, logically ordered, and free from grammatical errors.
This task is intended to simulate an end-to-end user testing phase, encouraging you to critically engage with how feedback can drive iterative design. You are expected to invest 30 to 35 hours to thoroughly develop your testing plan and analyses, ensuring a robust and reflective document that bridges theory with practice in virtual human-centered design.
Task Objective: The final task is designed to synthesize your learning and experiences from the previous weeks into a comprehensive reflective report. This report should evaluate your overall design process, reflect on key insights, and articulate future recommendations for improvement in virtual human-centered design. The aim is to consolidate your experience and provide an extensive evaluation of your project journey.
Expected Deliverables: Submit a DOC file that contains an executive summary of your design work over the internship period, a critical evaluation of the methodologies used, and a personal reflection on lessons learned. Your document should include sections for a project timeline, key milestones, challenges encountered, and future design recommendations.
Key Steps:
- Begin with an executive summary that succinctly recounts your project objectives, major tasks, and outcomes.
- Create a detailed timeline that maps each week’s task and highlights significant milestones.
- Critically evaluate the methodologies, techniques, and strategies employed in each task, discussing both their strengths and challenges.
- Write a reflective section that includes observations on your personal growth, insights gained from user-centered design, and recommendations for future iterations of the project.
- Ensure that your document includes well-organized sections with clear headers, comprehensive narratives, and actionable insights.
Evaluation Criteria:
- Your final evaluation must be comprehensive, covering every aspect of the design process and linking back to the principles of Design Thinking.
- The reflective analysis should be insightful, demonstrating both critical thinking and a commitment to personal and professional growth.
- The DOC file should be well-organized, use professional formatting, and be free from language and formatting errors.
- Integration of a timeline and detailed documentation of challenges and milestones is essential.
This culminating task encapsulates the entire internship experience, emphasizing both analytical review and personal reflection. Allocate approximately 30 to 35 hours to produce a thorough report that integrates your research, design iterations, and reflective assessments. Your final document should serve as a valuable resource for future endeavors and illustrate your comprehensive understanding of virtual human-centered design.